A Thankful Attendee of the Cross-Border Mediation Masterclass
This article is written by Chloe Chua Kay Ee - National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law
On 16 October 2019, a couple of friends and I attended the Cross-Border Mediation Masterclass jointly organised by PracticeForte, ALSA Singapore and SMU Law International Relations Club. As final year law students who are keen on going into family law, this 4-hour workshop was deeply enriching and beneficial to us. Furthermore, it managed to be what most typical law classes have failed to be, it was fun!
The Masterclass could be broadly categorised into 2 categories – the seminars, which equipped us with the fundamentals of cross-border mediation and gave us insight into practical experiences, and the role play, which allowed us to directly apply our learnings from the preceding seminars.
It was a true privilege to listen to and interact with the 4 guest speakers.
Ms. Susan Tay and Mr. Rajan Chettiar, both seasoned veterans in family law, condensed the law on international mediation for us greenhorns and infused their seminars with personal anecdotes that kept us engaged and receptive. They made us realise that, given the unstoppable force of globalisation, cross-border disputes are no longer the exception these days. Furthermore, they helped us see the benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation. Not only did we get to hear from their perspectives as mediators, we also received a very instructive 5W1H rundown on being a mediation advocate by Ms. Tay. This was particularly useful as it gave us insight to a lawyer’s role in mediation such that we would be better placed to serve our future clients.
In addition to building up our legal foundation on this alternative dispute resolution, the Masterclass also provided us with a holistic perspective of mediation through Dr. Peter Loke and Mr. Lai Mun Loon’s seminars.
Dr. Loke, an accomplished medical mediator, told us that the biggest driver of complaints against medical practitioners stem from dissatisfaction with their patient-communication and the rationale behind this is a mismatch in expectations and reality leading to disappointment and anger. Through this, he emphasised the power of empathy, care and/ or remorse and how these tactful emotions can make a world of a difference. His advice crosses contexts and seems to be universal to all who wish to be effective communicators.
Mr Lai, with his background in social work and experience with both counselling and mediation, showed us how the two disciplines intertwine and diverge. Instructively, he taught us how to identify which type of cases are ready or suitable for mediation and which are not as well as how to identify when cases should be referred to for counselling. Given the wealth of practical advice we had received, we were all very thankful that we had the opportunity to attend such a fulfilling workshop.
The Role Play
The simulation exercise we were given involved us role playing as mediators, observers and parties to a cross-border family dispute where one party had begun Hague proceedings (a civil remedy to parents seeking the return of a child wrongfully removed or retained across international borders) against his spouse for refusing to return their children to their country of residence.
Although most of us had little to no experience with mediation prior to this Masterclass, we thoroughly enjoyed ourselves in our various roles. As the ‘mediator’, I found myself relying on what I had just learnt from the seminars to help me in my role. I listened actively to the parties, showed empathy, and reframed their own words back to them when I was in doubt. Personally, it was a rather exciting first attempt at mediation.
One of the biggest highlights of the workshop was witnessing a fishbowl exercise with Mr. Lai as the mediator and Ms. Tay and Mr. Chettiar as the parties. The latter two’s commitment to their roles brought forth the complexities and tensions in real life mediation. In the short but effective exercise, Mr. Lai seamlessly employed a great number of useful techniques such as asking hypothetical questions and reality testing the parties’ suggestions, normalising what the parties are going through and breaking into separate sessions to better deal with each party. The general takeaway from this would be the importance of the control of the mediator in order to successfully apply the mediation tools.
At the end of the workshop, participants received a beautiful certificate of appreciation as well as the option to have the slide decks from the workshop emailed to us. Full of guiding tips and helpful information, these valuable slides coupled with the invaluable workshop experience will definitely come in handy as we make our foray into the legal profession. Indeed, on top of the sheer number of takeaways from this one workshop, the entire experience was a true delight. The atmosphere was welcoming and friendly and the environment was highly conducive for learning. The 4 retrospectively short hours spent at SMU were so beneficial and enjoyable that this attendee would like to convey her sincerest gratitude to the organisers of this Masterclass.
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases: The Mediation Advocate (Part 5)
- The Future of Family Practice
- UZN v UZM – Dissipation of Assets and Adverse Inference– A Lawyer’s Perspective Part 2
- UZN v UZM – Dissipation of Assets and Adverse Inference: A Lawyer’s Perspective Part 1 Rationale Behind Division of Matrimonial Assets
- UZN vs UZM: Undisclosed Assets and Adverse Inference- A Forensic Accountant’s Perspective
- The Life Cycle Of A Start-Up: From Cradle To Grave (Part 1)
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases –The Mediator (Part 4)
- Numbers Tell The Story: Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases – The Accountant (Part 3)
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases – The Lawyer (Part 2)
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases (Part 1)
- “No one is Above The Law- Probation Sentencing Guidelines in the Case of PP v Terence Siow Kai Yuan”
- “COVID-19 Temporary Measures Act- Navigating Temporary Relief With A Peace Approach: Part 1”
- Working from Home – 5 Doable Steps to Protecting Confidential Data
- Working Remotely – What Do I Need to Do?
- Adopting Work-From-Home For Your Company? These Singapore Government Grants Can Help
- Managing your children well during the “circuit -breaker” period.
- CCB Time Capsule
- Covid, Co-Parenting? Just Cooperate
- PF Mediate – MEDIATION FOR HAGUE CONVENTION & RELOCATION CASES PART 2 – Travelling Mediators
- Collaborative Divorce
- An interview with PF’s Co-Founder Susan Tay
- Are Parents Always Liable for Their Children’s Maintenance?
- A Thankful Attendee of the Cross-Border Mediation Masterclass
- Recognition of Foreign Divorce In The Philippines: What You Need To Know
- Adopting the peace approach to avoid unnecessary litigation: The Case of Goh Rosaline v Goh Lian Chyu and another
- Adopting the Peace Approach in the interest of the Child
- Litigation & Mediation: The Hybrid Method
- Cyber law in Singapore: A Quick Overview
- Protection from Online Falsehood and Manipulation Act 2019: What is its impact on legitimate businesses?
- Collaborative Practice
- Mediation and Civil Disputes
- Caught Between The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea
- Breaking down a marriage: How can it be done?
- The ABCs of Trusts
- Start Anew, Start Afresh!
- Voice of The Unmarried Mother Heard
- Reflections of An Accounts Intern
- Portrait of the Old Timer – The Not-So-Private-Nor-Secret Life of a Sole Proprietor of a Singapore Law Practice 1990-2018 (with 2-year hiatus 2005-2007)
- Mediation for Hague Convention and Relocation Cases
- PracticeForte 3rd Anniversary
- Between A Rock And A Hard Place – Case Study of UFZ V UFY
- Hague Convention on International Child Abduction: The Other Side
- Mediation for *Hague and Relocation Cases
- On the Move – Parental Relocation in Singapore
- PracticeForte Day Out – FAST
- Basic Guide To Mediation
- Third Party’s Interest In Matrimonial Assets: The Case of UDA v UDB
Please note that the topics of discussion on this website are prepared for the purposes of general information only. They do not constitute legal advice. No information presented on this website, or communicated to our through the website is intended to create a lawyer-client relationship. Therefore you are strongly encouraged to seek legal counsel for appropriate advise,