Can I leave Singapore with our child to move abroad without my ex’s consent?
Written by Susan Tay assisted by Isabel Chew-Lau.
This article is published in conjunction with PracticeForte’s Project Relocation initiative.
If your relationship has broken down, you may be thinking of moving away from Singapore to another country. There could be a myriad of reasons for your desire to immigrate overseas: perhaps you have better career prospects or family in the other country. It could even be the case that you simply no longer want to live in the same country as your ex-partner. No problem ..if you are thinking of moving overseas by yourself.
However, the situation may be more complicated if:
- You have a child with your ex, who has custody rights over your child;
- The child is under 16 years old;
- You want your child to move overseas with you;
- Your child has a close connection to Singapore, having lived here for some time and having been integrated into the Singapore community i.e. he or she is habitually resident in Singapore; and
- Your ex has not consented to the child moving overseas.
In that case, you may not be able to unilaterally move overseas with your child. This is because Singapore is a party to the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction (“the Hague Convention”). As of 2011, Singapore incorporated the Hague Convention into our domestic law under the International Child Abduction Act (Cap 143C).
Practically, this means that if you move overseas with your child, your ex-partner may be able to compel your child to return to Singapore. He or she can apply to the Singapore authorities to ask the other country’s authorities to issue an order that the child be returned here. The other country would have to comply if they make a preliminary finding that:
- The other country (“the Requested State”) is a party to the Hague Convention (the list of contracting states can be found at https://www.hcch.net/en/states/hcch-members :
- The Hague Convention applies to the child i.e. the child is habitually resident in Singapore and is under 16 years old;
- The removal of the child from Singapore was wrongful in that it breached the custody rights your ex-partner had under Singapore law;
- Your ex was exercising those custody rights;
- Your ex did not consent to your moving the child overseas;
- There is no grave risk that the child will be exposed to physical or psychological harm or be placed in an intolerable situation in Singapore; and
- There is no other reason for the Requested State’s authorities to refuse to order the return of the child.
Defending Hague proceedings in the country that you move to will likely be expensive and stressful for both your ex and you. Moreover, if you are not successful in defending the Hague proceedings overseas, the return order will mean having your child brought back here. Assuming you still want to move overseas with the child after you bring your child back to Singapore, you will have to make the applications in the Family Justice Courts here to determine issues like:
- Who has custody over the child?
- Will it be in the best interests of the child to stay here in Singapore or move with you?
- Will access by the left behind parent be severely impaired because of the move? How will that affect the Child?
What then will be the good way to do this?
The obvious answer will of course be to see if you can negotiate a consent from your ex. A highly recommended way to do this will be through mediation. Having a trained mediator who is familiar with custody and relocation issues will often pave the way for conversations between you and your ex to begin and the chances of an amicable resolution can be fairly high. Mediations have proven very successful even for parties who started poles apart or who found it impossible to converse with each other.
Even if no agreement can be reached, there is still a right way.
You could take out a relocation application in the Singapore courts. If granted, the court will allow you to move overseas with your child, even without your ex-partner’s consent.
In determining whether to grant such applications, the court’s paramount consideration is the welfare of the child. This is tied to the reasonableness of your request, and the following non-exhaustive list of factors may be relevant:
- Whether your desire to relocate is founded in bad faith;
- Whether you have familial support in the overseas country;
- Whether you have remarried to a new spouse from a different country;
- The earning capacity of both parties in Singapore and overseas;
- The impact of uprooting the child from Singapore; and
- The child’s interest in having a meaningful relationship with both parents.
If you think that your child’s interests will be better served by moving overseas with you, consider talking to your ex. If you find that difficult, do seriously consider mediation. Your next course, if even that does not work is then to take out a relocation application. This may save you a huge deal of time and costs – and greater peace of mind – in moving overseas with your child.
The last thing you should do is to just leave. Credible studies have shown that an “abducted” child deprived of one parent’s contact for a long time can leave the child with irreparable psychological harm.
Written by Susan Tay & Isabel Chew-Lau.
This article is published in conjunction with PracticeForte’s Project Relocation initiative.
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases: The Mediation Advocate (Part 5)
- The Future of Family Practice
- UZN v UZM – Dissipation of Assets and Adverse Inference– A Lawyer’s Perspective Part 2
- UZN v UZM – Dissipation of Assets and Adverse Inference: A Lawyer’s Perspective Part 1 Rationale Behind Division of Matrimonial Assets
- UZN vs UZM: Undisclosed Assets and Adverse Inference- A Forensic Accountant’s Perspective
- The Life Cycle Of A Start-Up: From Cradle To Grave (Part 1)
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases –The Mediator (Part 4)
- Numbers Tell The Story: Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases – The Accountant (Part 3)
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases – The Lawyer (Part 2)
- Therapeutic Justice in Family Cases (Part 1)
- “No one is Above The Law- Probation Sentencing Guidelines in the Case of PP v Terence Siow Kai Yuan”
- “COVID-19 Temporary Measures Act- Navigating Temporary Relief With A Peace Approach: Part 1”
- Working from Home – 5 Doable Steps to Protecting Confidential Data
- Working Remotely – What Do I Need to Do?
- Adopting Work-From-Home For Your Company? These Singapore Government Grants Can Help
- Managing your children well during the “circuit -breaker” period.
- CCB Time Capsule
- Covid, Co-Parenting? Just Cooperate
- PF Mediate – MEDIATION FOR HAGUE CONVENTION & RELOCATION CASES PART 2 – Travelling Mediators
- Collaborative Divorce
- An interview with PF’s Co-Founder Susan Tay
- Are Parents Always Liable for Their Children’s Maintenance?
- A Thankful Attendee of the Cross-Border Mediation Masterclass
- Recognition of Foreign Divorce In The Philippines: What You Need To Know
- Adopting the peace approach to avoid unnecessary litigation: The Case of Goh Rosaline v Goh Lian Chyu and another
- Adopting the Peace Approach in the interest of the Child
- Litigation & Mediation: The Hybrid Method
- Cyber law in Singapore: A Quick Overview
- Protection from Online Falsehood and Manipulation Act 2019: What is its impact on legitimate businesses?
- Collaborative Practice
- Mediation and Civil Disputes
- Caught Between The Devil And The Deep Blue Sea
- Breaking down a marriage: How can it be done?
- The ABCs of Trusts
- Start Anew, Start Afresh!
- Voice of The Unmarried Mother Heard
- Reflections of An Accounts Intern
- Portrait of the Old Timer – The Not-So-Private-Nor-Secret Life of a Sole Proprietor of a Singapore Law Practice 1990-2018 (with 2-year hiatus 2005-2007)
- Mediation for Hague Convention and Relocation Cases
- PracticeForte 3rd Anniversary
- Between A Rock And A Hard Place – Case Study of UFZ V UFY
- Hague Convention on International Child Abduction: The Other Side
- Mediation for *Hague and Relocation Cases
- On the Move – Parental Relocation in Singapore
- PracticeForte Day Out – FAST
- Basic Guide To Mediation
- Third Party’s Interest In Matrimonial Assets: The Case of UDA v UDB
ABOUT PRACTICEFORTE’S PROJECT RELOCATION
Started in July 2017 by the Family Division of PracticeForte Advisory, this project is an initiative to make legal help more accessible to spouses in overcoming the legal challenges to obtain court consent to return to their countries of origin with their children for the welfare of the children.
Project Relocation is part of PracticeForte Advisory’s ongoing efforts ot further our twin pillar focus of “Building Peace, Building Expertise”.
ABOUT PRACTICEFORTE ADVISORY
PracticeForte Advisory is a network of independent professional advisory firms comprising, amongst others, lawyers, mediators, accountants, forensic experts and others. This niche group of professional advisory firms are banded together under the brand name: PracticeForte Advisory.
ABOUT PRACTICEFORTE FAMILY DIVISION
PracticeForte Family Division comprises of specialist practitioners of Family Law including lawyers focused on matrimonial issue, mediators trained in resolving all family concerns: parenting coordinators to assist parents in their co-parenting journeys, counsellors and therapists.
OTP LAW CORPORATION is part of PracticeForte Advisory and its director, Ms Susan Tay is a member of the PracticeForte Family Division. Susan has had experience in representing parties as their lawyer in applications relating to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction as well as relocation applications with the Family Justice Courts, Singapore. Susan is a trained parenting coordinator. She is also a mediator and is accredited on various panels as a family mediator. In particular, she is specially trained in cross border mediation for family conflict and child abduction and is accredited as one of the mediators with MiKK e.V International Mediation Centre for Family Conflict and Child Abduction.
For any enquiries, please email us at email@example.com or call us at 62213009.
Please note that the topics of discussion on this website are prepared for the purposes of general information only. They do not constitute legal advice. No information presented on this website, or communicated to our through the website is intended to create a lawyer-client relationship. Therefore you are strongly encouraged to seek legal counsel for appropriate advise,